.gif)
The report, published by the department for communities and local government, looks at the perceived problems that can be created where there are concentrations of HMOs.
This issue, which is often given greatest prominence in university towns, leading to so called 'studentification', has led some backbench MPs and local authority officers to argue for greater planning controls over HMOs.
This has been strongly resisted by landlord organisations, including the BPF, and its affiliated landlord associations around the country.
-- Advertisement --
The BPF believes it is nonsensical to treble student numbers in a decade and then try to restrict an affordable supply of property to house them.
It will be for government to decide which course of action is followed as part of its deliberations on the forthcoming Housing Reform green paper.
The report suggests the 'best practice' option should be pursued in the short-to-medium term, with amendment to the UCO only being something that is contemplated after far deeper research and consultation.
In reaction, Ian Fletcher, Director of Residential Policy at the BPF, said: "If you expand student numbers by 1.5 million over a decade and a half those kids have got to live somewhere. What other country in the world would send its young people off to university without making proper provision for where they will live– a gap which the private sector has proudly filled.
"HMOs are not only an important source of accommodation for students, but also for people who are often least able to put a roof over their heads in society. Placing planning restrictions on this important source of affordable accommodation is something we will be arguing strongly should be resisted because it will restrict supply, raise rents and could be used unscrupulously to restrict particular groups in society to particular areas in towns and cities."
(CD/JM)
